In today’s fast-moving warehouse world, every meter walked and every second saved counts. One of the most crucial yet often underestimated activities in warehouse management is slotting — deciding where products should be placed on the shelves. Good slotting ensures that fast-moving items are closer to pickers, slow movers are further away, and the overall warehouse flow is as efficient as possible. Poor slotting, on the other hand, increases travel time, creates congestion, and drives up costs.
Imagine a supermarket where milk is placed in the farthest corner while shoelaces sit right by the entrance. Customers would walk much more than necessary to get everyday essentials. The same logic applies in a warehouse: every unnecessary step taken by a picker translates into lost productivity, higher labor costs & forklift lease, and longer lead times.
Slotting aims to solve this. It uses data to determine where each product (SKU) should be stored for the most efficient picking process. Traditionally, this is done through ABC analysis.
In traditional warehouse management, ABC slotting is a way to classify products based on their picking frequency or importance:
Usually, this classification is done using Excel-based analytics. The analyst takes a dataset — often the number of order lines per SKU in a given time period — and sorts the items into A, B, and C groups. A-items are placed closer to pickers, while C-items are placed further away.
It sounds logical, and for decades, this approach has worked well enough. But it has some deep-rooted problems.
The Limitations of Traditional ABC SlottingThese choices vary between individuals, which means the results vary too.
ABC analysis looks at just one dimension — the number of order lines in a fixed timeframe. But warehouse dynamics are far more complex. Seasonality, promotions, new product introductions, and changing order patterns are ignored
Once the new slotting is implemented, measuring actual improvements is difficult. Did the new layout really shorten pick paths? Did it reduce labor hours? Often, the analysis stops at implementation, and the results rely on gut feeling rather than data-backed feedback.
In short, traditional ABC slotting is simple but static. It cannot adapt or learn from real warehouse behavior over time.
Now imagine a system that doesn’t just analyze past data but learns from every pick, forecast, and simulation. That’s what AI slotting agents like Freja Analytics do.
AI agents take warehouse slotting to a completely new level by combining data-driven learning with continuous simulation and feedback.
Traditional ABC slotting was once a breakthrough. It gave structure to warehouse organization when data tools were limited. But in a world driven by real-time analytics and machine learning, it has reached its limits.
AI agents like Freja Analytics bring a new era of data-driven intelligence to warehouse operations. They combine powerful simulation capabilities, advanced statistical modelling, and real-world feedback to make smarter, faster, and more accurate slotting decisions.
The result? Real, measurable savings — often 15–25% shorter pick paths and significant labor cost reductions.
In the end, the difference is clear: While traditional ABC depends on static spreadsheets and human judgment, AI agents learn, adapt, and continuously improve. That’s why AI-driven slotting will always win — not by chance, but by data.